Friday, February 25, 2011
16th Summer Institute in Statistical Genetics
It's a bit pricey but probably a great workshop for stats and/or genetics geeks. Joe Felsenstein and Sudhir Kumar are among the instructors.
Thursday, February 24, 2011
Structure of DNMT1-DNA Complex Reveals a Role for Autoinhibition in Maintenance DNA Methylation
Researchers sort out the mechanism for only methylating hemimethylated CpG sites and therefore avoiding de novo methylation.
Genomic signatures of diet-related shifts during human origins
Review of genomic evidence for dietary shifts in humans
Tuesday, February 22, 2011
Friday, February 18, 2011
Evolutionary History of Chimpanzees Inferred from Complete Mitochondrial Genomes
The authors use mitochondrial genomes from fecal DNA to infer an evolutionary history (i.e. divergence dates) of the four subspecies of chimpanzees.
Wednesday, February 9, 2011
Janet Rowley on discovery research (aka fishing)
Q. Do you think that the type of career you’ve had would be possible today?
A. No. I was doing observationally driven research. That’s the kiss of death if you’re looking for funding today. We’re so fixated now on hypothesis-driven research that if you do what I did, it would be called a “fishing expedition,” a bad thing.
O.K., we knew about the Philadelphia chromosome, and after banding we had the technology to discover gains and losses among the different chromosomes. But once you knew that, what were the implications of the gains and losses? That’s the “fishing,” because there wasn’t a hypothesis.
Well, if you don’t know anything, you can’t have a sensible hypothesis.
I keep saying that fishing is good. You’re fishing because you want to know what’s there.
A. No. I was doing observationally driven research. That’s the kiss of death if you’re looking for funding today. We’re so fixated now on hypothesis-driven research that if you do what I did, it would be called a “fishing expedition,” a bad thing.
O.K., we knew about the Philadelphia chromosome, and after banding we had the technology to discover gains and losses among the different chromosomes. But once you knew that, what were the implications of the gains and losses? That’s the “fishing,” because there wasn’t a hypothesis.
Well, if you don’t know anything, you can’t have a sensible hypothesis.
I keep saying that fishing is good. You’re fishing because you want to know what’s there.
Tuesday, February 8, 2011
Friday, February 4, 2011
avpr1a and social monogamy in free-living prairie voles
Another reminder that what we see in the field isn't necessarily what we see in the lab...
Wednesday, February 2, 2011
Friendship and shared genes
"...people's friends may not only have similar traits, but actually resemble each other on a genotypic level."
Cool study on relationships between behavior, personality, and genetics in humans.
Correlated genotypes in friendship networks; PNAS 2011
Cool study on relationships between behavior, personality, and genetics in humans.
Correlated genotypes in friendship networks; PNAS 2011
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)